With the case on Jane Browning, it is amazing how a little research can make the situation turnout in a worst case scenario. I feel that the public is quite gullible when they think it is a “research”. It sounded somewhat believable, and good storytellers usually make their story quite believable. I feel that because Jane Browning did not put so much   “BS” that would turn the readers off, it was quite believable. But at the same time, those that were interested in the story should have questioned themselves, “how true is this?” They needed to separate the facts from fiction when they hear a story. But that is where I think the problem was. If the readers buy into everything that the storyteller says, then the amazing human ability to question anything in our life would be lost in the process. It is a terrible thing to learn something false or not entirely true, and consider it to be true. That is false knowledge and that can be dangerous. Yes, history has been distorted much in the past through propaganda, but in this free society that we are living in, everyone should at least give an effort to question anything.